Author |
Message |
Sharnhorst
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:51 pm Posts: 331
|
kirkeastment wrote: Then the task isn't for them.
The newer LM's have higher requirements that before, this suggests to me that they are once again aimed at those of a higher rank than the previous LM's were.
If they can't do a certain task or any of the tasks then they should sit out that lm and wait for one they can do instead.
Well, the new LM seems to be tailored for EoTS hehe  I'm sure you guys have an easy time with them. Hope Dan adds this "skip mission" thingy he said he was going to add if that's the case.
|
Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:00 pm |
|
 |
Arbiter
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:31 am Posts: 277
|
Sharnhorst wrote: Arbiter wrote: Sharnhorst wrote: Obviously not saying that the EM is going to extinguish, but I can see people struggling with the new missions, and EM prices going up already. What? People might struggle to do everything in the game all the time? Horror of unspeakable horrors! Lol mate  You excel at the art of trolling ;p Can you tell me your IGN and legion name? just curious to see how well you know the game and all ... I've been playing more than 3 years and am in a top 10 Legion. I wasn't trolling, you just have a stupid suggestion because you think people should be able to do everything all the time. If people are having trouble they can increase their production or make better decisions about what to do with their resources.
_________________ "I guess love's a funny thing--the way it fades away without a warning. It doesn't ask to be excused, and when it's gone--oh, it's gone--it ain't ever coming back"
|
Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:14 pm |
|
 |
Sharnhorst
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:51 pm Posts: 331
|
Arbiter wrote: I've been playing more than 3 years and am in a top 10 Legion.
I wasn't trolling, you just have a stupid suggestion because you think people should be able to do everything all the time. If people are having trouble they can increase their production or make better decisions about what to do with their resources.
Well, afraid to give me your IGN?  When I made the post I fully expected people to disagree with me, but it's the way you post and talk to people mate... and you know it. BTW, for a 3 years old ship, your arti production is pretty bad 
|
Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:22 pm |
|
 |
Arbiter
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:31 am Posts: 277
|
Sharnhorst wrote: Arbiter wrote: I've been playing more than 3 years and am in a top 10 Legion.
I wasn't trolling, you just have a stupid suggestion because you think people should be able to do everything all the time. If people are having trouble they can increase their production or make better decisions about what to do with their resources.
Well, afraid to give me your IGN?  When I made the post I fully expected people to disagree with me, but it's the way you post and talk to people mate... and you know it. BTW, for a 3 years old ship, your arti production is pretty bad  ...So you're saying you still don't have any points to make besides whining that you can't do everything? Sounds good.
_________________ "I guess love's a funny thing--the way it fades away without a warning. It doesn't ask to be excused, and when it's gone--oh, it's gone--it ain't ever coming back"
|
Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:23 pm |
|
 |
Sharnhorst
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:51 pm Posts: 331
|
Yes, I concede... you win the argument, you proved how smart you are over an internet forum... congratulations again  now can I have your IGN please?
|
Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:25 pm |
|
 |
Arbiter
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:31 am Posts: 277
|
Sharnhorst wrote: Yes, I concede... you win the argument, you proved how smart you are over an internet forum... congratulations again  now can I have your IGN please? Wasn't trying to prove anything, just wanted to shut up your whining.
_________________ "I guess love's a funny thing--the way it fades away without a warning. It doesn't ask to be excused, and when it's gone--oh, it's gone--it ain't ever coming back"
|
Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:40 pm |
|
 |
Sharnhorst
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:51 pm Posts: 331
|
Arbiter wrote: Sharnhorst wrote: Yes, I concede... you win the argument, you proved how smart you are over an internet forum... congratulations again  now can I have your IGN please? Wasn't trying to prove anything, just wanted to shut up your whining. Well, you managed to do that... again, well done. Now, would you be so kind of giving me your IGN? I just would like to take a look at your ship... you are probably out of my badging range anyway, so no need to be afraid 
|
Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:44 pm |
|
 |
Arbiter
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:31 am Posts: 277
|
Sharnhorst wrote: Now, would you be so kind of giving me your IGN? I just would like to take a look at your ship... you are probably out of my badging range anyway, so no need to be afraid As you pointed out earlier, I am an idiot, so I will definitely tell you. My ign is Prizmz, I am in The Knights Who Say Ni. You?
_________________ "I guess love's a funny thing--the way it fades away without a warning. It doesn't ask to be excused, and when it's gone--oh, it's gone--it ain't ever coming back"
|
Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:57 pm |
|
 |
Sharnhorst
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:51 pm Posts: 331
|
Arbiter wrote: Sharnhorst wrote: Now, would you be so kind of giving me your IGN? I just would like to take a look at your ship... you are probably out of my badging range anyway, so no need to be afraid As you pointed out earlier, I am an idiot, so I will definitely tell you. My ign is Prizmz, I am in The Knights Who Say Ni. You? O well, I will find out sooner or later ;D Typical troll you are, hiding at the first glance of trouble hehe. See you in game mate... soon I hope. Edit: my IGN is, surprise surprise... Sharnhorst! - I do not need to hide... and you know what legion I'm in already ;D
|
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:03 am |
|
 |
Sharnhorst
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:51 pm Posts: 331
|
BTW, I already know who you are... I was just testing if you would be "man" enough to admit it. I just wanna play with you a bit, it's fun you know  You can ask your Legion Leader, sent him a PM to confirm.
|
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:41 am |
|
 |
MrSpock
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 3:49 pm Posts: 556
|
Please watch the language. Like him or hate him, Sharnhorst brought up an interesting topic for discussion. Please keep this on topic.
|
Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:33 am |
|
 |
Arbiter
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:31 am Posts: 277
|
Sharnhorst wrote: BTW, I already know who you are... I was just testing if you would be "man" enough to admit it. I just wanna play with you a bit, it's fun you know  You can ask your Legion Leader, sent him a PM to confirm. My Legion leader doesn't know who I am. EDIT: Okay, I guess I was wrong about that, Bakkus knew.
_________________ "I guess love's a funny thing--the way it fades away without a warning. It doesn't ask to be excused, and when it's gone--oh, it's gone--it ain't ever coming back"
|
Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:50 am |
|
 |
blueyedguy101
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:54 pm Posts: 69
|
I think Dan is making high em requirements, because he sees the game has become only focused on artifact production and the game losing balance. The same with the high energy requirements as of late too. There is getting to be a select bunch of ships that are getting monster in strength compared to other people. And that is fine, you work hard at the game you get good. But that being said too, it causes a lot of people to quit, and that affects the survival of the game and Dan's business. So it only makes since he going to try to direct the game in the right direction. By making the game requirements of higher EM/energy, a person needs more mineral production and energy, so that slowly shifts things away from more arty production and a few less TO's.
|
Tue Apr 08, 2014 2:16 am |
|
 |
Pennsyltucky
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:55 pm Posts: 379
|
blueyedguy101 wrote: I think Dan is making high em requirements, because he sees the game has become only focused on artifact production and the game losing balance. The same with the high energy requirements as of late too. There is getting to be a select bunch of ships that are getting monster in strength compared to other people. And that is fine, you work hard at the game you get good. But that being said too, it causes a lot of people to quit, and that affects the survival of the game and Dan's business. So it only makes since he going to try to direct the game in the right direction. By making the game requirements of higher EM/energy, a person needs more mineral production and energy, so that slowly shifts things away from more arty production and a few less TO's. Good point
_________________
|
Tue Apr 08, 2014 2:21 am |
|
 |
Arbiter
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:31 am Posts: 277
|
blueyedguy101 wrote: I think Dan is making high em requirements, because he sees the game has become only focused on artifact production and the game losing balance. The same with the high energy requirements as of late too. There is getting to be a select bunch of ships that are getting monster in strength compared to other people. And that is fine, you work hard at the game you get good. But that being said too, it causes a lot of people to quit, and that affects the survival of the game and Dan's business. So it only makes since he going to try to direct the game in the right direction. By making the game requirements of higher EM/energy, a person needs more mineral production and energy, so that slowly shifts things away from more arty production and a few less TO's. Yeah, but he's making a great point that he doesn't want more mining, so the costs need to be lowered.
_________________ "I guess love's a funny thing--the way it fades away without a warning. It doesn't ask to be excused, and when it's gone--oh, it's gone--it ain't ever coming back"
|
Tue Apr 08, 2014 2:22 am |
|
 |
Glaxor
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2013 8:36 pm Posts: 129
|
I can dig it. Before LMs and the purger mission buff people were asking Dan to take it out of the %contribution tally on basses because everyone had huge stockpiles and nothing to spend it on leading to a massive dump as soon as a base leveled and the people who were online getting an almost unmatchable head start. Hopefully now prices can come to some sort of equilibrium where A>M>R instead of the current state of A>>>>>>>>>M>R and a maxed toxic won't take months to pay for itself to someone with lots of planets. (He did a similar thing with XTS, but someone did the math on that LM and found it way more difficult than any other so I don't see it being used more than once per person to use up peoples' left overs.)
Edit: Blueeye snaked me...clever boy
_________________ Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice. -- Winston Churchill
|
Tue Apr 08, 2014 2:26 am |
|
 |
senatorhung
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:09 am Posts: 3473
|
i disagree with the OP. yes, EM is now more valuable than before, but there is little chance of it running out. anyone who does not address the need for EM in their own mining production will just have to skip those particular tasks. choices have consequences.
i am still aiming for a 65% arti 20% mining 15% research distro ... but that is still far into the future. i see no issue with adjusting that to 60/25/15 if EM production does not keep pace with my needs.
_________________Rank 3950 Litheor Governor 100% DCR r385-r2200 GL Marauder #26 _____________ PvP leaderboards: 70212 raids: #1; 40852 kills: #1; 96377 hacks: #3;
|
Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:24 am |
|
 |
Sharnhorst
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:51 pm Posts: 331
|
hum how about changing the GTC so more EM can be bought at the same time?
E.g. from 1k EM per transaction to 100k or similar?
|
Tue Apr 08, 2014 6:54 am |
|
 |
Devastation
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:17 pm Posts: 3632 Location: Gone.
|
Sharnhorst wrote: hum how about changing the GTC so more EM can be bought at the same time?
E.g. from 1k EM per transaction to 100k or similar? This.
_________________ Devastation - Rank 1209 - Proud Officer of Imperium of Namalak
|
Tue Apr 08, 2014 7:11 am |
|
 |
Arbiter
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:31 am Posts: 277
|
Sharnhorst wrote: hum how about changing the GTC so more EM can be bought at the same time?
E.g. from 1k EM per transaction to 100k or similar? Definitely need this. Unfortunately, I believe it was suggested almost immediately after the GTC came out, and obviously hasn't been done, so I'm not gonna hold my breath.
_________________ "I guess love's a funny thing--the way it fades away without a warning. It doesn't ask to be excused, and when it's gone--oh, it's gone--it ain't ever coming back"
|
Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:46 pm |
|
 |
|