View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu May 15, 2025 10:19 pm



Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
 Planet Table 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 11:01 am
Posts: 5825
Location: Zolar
Reply with quote
This table is based on a new colony totally dedicated to production with +4 buildings. I used large/rich as the base mark, and figures around that are in yellow. Above are in green and below are in red. It only goes up to mega rich, as it is unlikely you will be taking anything higher than this, although not impossible. Based on this, any planet producing less than 72 with +4 is not worth defending.

Image

_________________
ImageImageImageImage


Sun Aug 21, 2011 3:28 pm
Profile WWW

Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:11 am
Posts: 556
Reply with quote
That's really useful. Thanks. :D

_________________
ImageImage
Rank 550+ officer. 31K+ NPC Kills. 270K+ battles. 1 very sore finger.

Cool Text - Create Your Own Logo


Sun Aug 21, 2011 9:32 pm
Profile

Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 11:01 pm
Posts: 2072
Reply with quote
nice table, good work.

_________________
Image


Sun Aug 21, 2011 9:56 pm
Profile

Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 2:17 am
Posts: 298
Reply with quote
I know its probably alot of work. Can you do these tables for structures +8 and above please?

_________________
Image


Sun Aug 21, 2011 11:03 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 3:18 am
Posts: 1012
Reply with quote
if I'm reading this all right then only 6 of these planets are "worth defending"...and while I agree with that theory for everything very massive and smaller, I would have to disagree in the fact that ANY colossal and mega Colossal planets; they normally take a LOT to create and never appear naturally(except in a dyson). They should always be defended because of their size.

_________________
Image
Galactic Alliance


Sun Aug 21, 2011 11:04 pm
Profile

Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 12:50 am
Posts: 49
Reply with quote
are you factoring in basic plantetary artifacts as well? we should assume every planet has 2(phase cutter, spy uplink, space elevator) 2(combination of processing, refining, and research) and 1 warp gate, so essintially every planet+5 production -5 space.

and yea your other stats on your planet do matter, but i do like the chart :). maybe some other non-lazy mathy guy can make the 8-10-12 chart for the higher level players :)


Mon Aug 22, 2011 2:33 pm
Profile

Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 12:50 am
Posts: 49
Reply with quote
TheSpartan wrote:
if I'm reading this all right then only 6 of these planets are "worth defending"...and while I agree with that theory for everything very massive and smaller, I would have to disagree in the fact that ANY colossal and mega Colossal planets; they normally take a LOT to create and never appear naturally(except in a dyson). They should always be defended because of their size.


No you arent reading it right, anything yellow or green is worth defending, yellow is just the "minimum defendable planets" everything green is in the HELL YEA DEFEND IT category


Mon Aug 22, 2011 2:36 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 2:44 am
Posts: 3751
Reply with quote
it really depends on how low someone's standards are

_________________
_________ Image

Officer Namba1 of The Unknown, Lv.666+ Dark Smuggler

Image


Mon Aug 22, 2011 2:44 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 11:01 am
Posts: 5825
Location: Zolar
Reply with quote
Y2KJMan wrote:
I know its probably alot of work. Can you do these tables for structures +8 and above please?


It's basically intended as a colonization guide. I chose +4 because most people have them.

DelTako wrote:
are you factoring in basic plantetary artifacts as well? we should assume every planet has 2(phase cutter, spy uplink, space elevator) 2(combination of processing, refining, and research) and 1 warp gate, so essintially every planet+5 production -5 space.


No, as it was intended to be a base minimum.

TheSpartan wrote:
if I'm reading this all right then only 6 of these planets are "worth defending"...and while I agree with that theory for everything very massive and smaller, I would have to disagree in the fact that ANY colossal and mega Colossal planets; they normally take a LOT to create and never appear naturally(except in a dyson). They should always be defended because of their size.


Totally agree. Generally speaking you wont find a colossal/mega colossal less than rich, so it doesn't matter too much.

Lone.Lycan wrote:
it really depends on how low someone's standards are


From what I've heard, the generally accepted standard is large/rich, which came out at 36, and so 35-37 are marked in yellow.

_________________
ImageImageImageImage


Mon Aug 22, 2011 5:18 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 4:45 am
Posts: 1338
Reply with quote
Some of it depends on the resource, too. I'm less picky about artifact planets than others. Also depends on what you're planning to do with the world. If you're going to buff it (Lab Pods, Toxic Purifiers, Race abilities), all that matters is size. Find the biggest toxic you can and load it up to 16X - where you started from, resources-wise, is almost irrelevant.

_________________
Image


Mon Aug 22, 2011 11:29 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 1441
Location: chilling inside of the epic Odyssey eating cookies
Reply with quote
i want a tiny X48 mega rich dyson! lol

_________________
join delta surfers! we have cookies
thanks xzien and thunderbolta for the banners!
Image
Image


Tue Aug 23, 2011 3:13 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 4:45 am
Posts: 1338
Reply with quote
blakespon wrote:
i want a tiny X48 mega rich dyson! lol


Yeah, someone built a sphere to capture the energy of a McDonald's heat lamp ;)

_________________
Image


Tue Aug 23, 2011 4:02 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 12:38 am
Posts: 112
Reply with quote
nice contribution you rock thunderbolta

_________________
ImageImage


Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:52 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 13 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 131 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.