For the record I think its a good idea. But I read through what's on it so far and most of the entries are anecdotal. No evidence whatsoever. I have little doubt that many of them are factual, but the one's that are need to be verifiable. The ambiguity sets a dangerous precedent: if all of the accusations are taken at face value, then any vindictive legion leader can spite a player they might simply not like. Being a Leader does not raise people above reproach, anyone can start a legion and that title does not make someone honorable.

Those of you who are serious about the legions you command: you have a responsibility to the community to provide hard evidence against the players who's reputations you have the power to ruin. Please do not do so lightly.

Now, I began by saying that the thread is a good idea and it is, just please, use it responsibly. And to the Leaders using the thread as a background check: please use good judgement. There will undoubtedly be players falsely accused on that list.

Use the thread well, and carefully.

How do you propose the leaders, or recruiters post the hard evidence. Anything you copy and paste can be edited.

Screenshots are the best bet. They can still be edited but it is the closest you can get to hard evidence.

yeah. a screenshot of the foul language, or the comm posts, or any other complaints they might have. otherwise its more of a who would you believe situation.

You want evidence ? I still have the screen shots showing Sid was lying.

I'm at work so i can't upload the screen shots. Give me an email I will send them to you.

i think the shame list should only be for ppl to know, spies, cheats like multi account, bullying players etc so we can not make the mistake recruiting them