View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 4:11 pm



Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 Galactic Occupancy 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 1:02 am
Posts: 391
Reply with quote
@Andy you are correct. I think Dan wants people to have a good chance of finding occupied planets as well as unoccupied planets. That way its kind of like a constant fight for your right to party. (on that planet)

_________________
Image


Sun May 16, 2010 3:15 am
Profile

Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 3:49 pm
Posts: 253
Reply with quote
RE: Are these planets fresh from the scan attempt, or from the planet list? Your planet list will include any planet shared by another player in your legion, which are often occupied.

They were from my own scanning. I've not managed to get anyone into my legion so that's not it.
Suspect its the right to party example but 7/32 still seems a bit steep when 79% of something like 600,000 planets are floating around.
That's 7 out of 32 found, not total scans.


Sun May 16, 2010 4:18 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 4:49 am
Posts: 2606
Location: Cowland
Reply with quote
Personally Iv only found about 20 occupied planets out of my 126 scanned. Which to me sounds like a good ratio.

Also Andy theres this thing called quoting, it really helps people know who your replying too.

_________________
Your right to an opinion does not mean your opinion is right.


Sun May 16, 2010 5:52 am
Profile

Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 3:49 pm
Posts: 253
Reply with quote
Cothordin wrote:
Personally Iv only found about 20 occupied planets out of my 126 scanned. Which to me sounds like a good ratio.

Also Andy theres this thing called quoting, it really helps people know who your replying too.


Heh.. duly noted. Sorry..


Sun May 16, 2010 4:01 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 4:49 am
Posts: 2606
Location: Cowland
Reply with quote
Andy wrote:
Cothordin wrote:
Personally Iv only found about 20 occupied planets out of my 126 scanned. Which to me sounds like a good ratio.

Also Andy theres this thing called quoting, it really helps people know who your replying too.


Heh.. duly noted. Sorry..

Np just hard to tell sometimes what/who your arguing against

_________________
Your right to an opinion does not mean your opinion is right.


Sun May 16, 2010 8:59 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 5:48 am
Posts: 1945
Reply with quote
How about adding one expensive artifact OR one high level mission that allows you to custom-name a planet that is only restricted to one custom name per account? That would be fun and players would feel little more attached and would want to name it to their homeworld..

_________________
Nocifer Deathblade, Founder and Leader of the Dysonians
Image


Thu May 20, 2010 2:17 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:00 pm
Posts: 2419
Reply with quote
webguydan wrote:
I thought I would post the current occupancy across all planets on a regular basis. :)

Current Planet Scan Saturation:
79% of planets have not yet been scanned by anyone

Current Planet Occupancy:
89% of planets are vacant


Dan can we have an update on this please ? :D :D

_________________
Image
Image


Thu Feb 02, 2012 11:05 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:51 am
Posts: 515
Reply with quote
Sparky wrote:
webguydan wrote:
I thought I would post the current occupancy across all planets on a regular basis. :)

Current Planet Scan Saturation:
79% of planets have not yet been scanned by anyone

Current Planet Occupancy:
89% of planets are vacant


Dan can we have an update on this please ? :D :D

+1

_________________
ImageImage
"well Very large very rich (volcanic) with no defence... its just asking to get stolen"


Thu Feb 02, 2012 11:13 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 7:07 am
Posts: 838
Location: South Africa
Reply with quote
+1 for getting an Update and +1 for pulling this from the archives :D

_________________
ImageImage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfmrChOgIsQ&feature=related


Thu Feb 02, 2012 11:15 am
Profile

Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 6:24 pm
Posts: 2810
Location: UK
Reply with quote
Also can we get an update for the number of planets in the galaxy too.

The number has been the same for months now, the last time it was like that you said there was an error of some kind which prevented this number from updating, and so you manually updated the number.


Thu Feb 02, 2012 11:18 am
Profile

Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:37 am
Posts: 2637
Reply with quote
+1

_________________
GREENSPLEEF
LEADER, CHILDREN OF GODS
http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=41899


Thu Feb 02, 2012 6:05 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 11:53 pm
Posts: 3756
Location: Aboard my floating fortress of ineptitude
Reply with quote
I thought this was a new thread

_________________
Image
Inventor of Invisible SandTM


Thu Feb 02, 2012 6:08 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 12:14 pm
Posts: 516
Reply with quote
Cloesdaddy wrote:
actually that would be an easy way to add planets... have the planet creator automatically pull a list of the players names and create a planet based off the user's names!!

yeah, and youll get planet named YourFaceSuck? (or something similar, there was a guy with name like that)
hehe

_________________
Image


Thu Feb 02, 2012 6:25 pm
Profile

Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 1:57 am
Posts: 12
Location: California US.
Reply with quote
Thinking we're living in a globular cluster based on the number of planets in the galaxy. If the galaxy were as large as the Milky Way based on the 100-300 billion star count in it there is an estimated number of planets that may go beyond the trillion mark since most stars in the galaxy are similar to our sun or smaller with several planets in orbit. I have no problem living in a globular cluster though, but maybe someday the game will reach such a popularity that there will be an event of "galactic collision where the globular cluster collides with another galaxy increasing the number of planets in the trillions. Or a new type of technology could be researched, maybe something along the lines of extra galactic wormhole drives or something for transport to nearby small galaxies.


Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:01 pm
Profile

Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:18 pm
Posts: 604
Reply with quote
Thanks dan- very useful info- actually happy to find planets others have already pre improved- so not complaining at all

_________________
Image
Once Fabulon, now known as Thebloodynine
Most exasperated leader at Project Anarchy. Don't talk to me till the caffeine hit is in
Have given up caffeine- probably best just not to talk to me


Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:00 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:00 pm
Posts: 2419
Reply with quote
Fabulon wrote:
Thanks dan- very useful info- actually happy to find planets others have already pre improved- so not complaining at all


this was almost 2 years old this topic i want dan to give us an update on it :D

_________________
Image
Image


Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:07 am
Profile

Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:18 pm
Posts: 604
Reply with quote
No problem sparky- not sure how my post changes yours lol

_________________
Image
Once Fabulon, now known as Thebloodynine
Most exasperated leader at Project Anarchy. Don't talk to me till the caffeine hit is in
Have given up caffeine- probably best just not to talk to me


Fri Feb 03, 2012 12:09 pm
Profile

Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 11:50 am
Posts: 208
Reply with quote
Im Curious, if the planet seeder seeds planets at a fixed percentage according to type size and resouces at random does it mean that it takes into account what is already available in th galaxy.

What i mean by this is there are thousands of Tiny planets if the seeder keeps adding them their representation gets larger and larger as they are not consumed. most people would purge them as they are frankly useless and so far down the chain that they are simply not worth expanding. It would be nice for a mini expander that can convert planets from very tiny up to average to max say large, or even average. Some people may hold on to certain mega planets.

I cant imagine many people using expanders in tiny planets.

_________________
Paratex

A leader of Ghosts -


Sat Feb 04, 2012 12:17 am
Profile

Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:37 am
Posts: 2637
Reply with quote
xtendacom wrote:
Im Curious, if the planet seeder seeds planets at a fixed percentage according to type size and resouces at random does it mean that it takes into account what is already available in th galaxy.

What i mean by this is there are thousands of Tiny planets if the seeder keeps adding them their representation gets larger and larger as they are not consumed. most people would purge them as they are frankly useless and so far down the chain that they are simply not worth expanding. It would be nice for a mini expander that can convert planets from very tiny up to average to max say large, or even average. Some people may hold on to certain mega planets.

I cant imagine many people using expanders in tiny planets.

+1

_________________
GREENSPLEEF
LEADER, CHILDREN OF GODS
http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=41899


Sat Feb 04, 2012 1:42 am
Profile

Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:46 pm
Posts: 10
Reply with quote
Yeah the last few months of planet pulls have been really poor. What is the current planet stats?


Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:11 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.