| View unanswered posts | View active topics |
It is currently Sun Jun 01, 2025 7:17 pm |
|
All times are UTC |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[ 9 posts ] |
| Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
What is more profitable?
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 10:05 pm Posts: 128 Location: Canada 
|
 So, I’ve been wondering about what would generate more profit: Using my terraformer on a VM Average/1x/Rich Oceanic or on my M Average/UR/VR Crystal.
Any thoughts? |
| Thu Jan 26, 2012 4:10 am |
 
|
|
|
 Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 4:43 pm Posts: 2110
|
I would hazard a guess at the Oceanic, as many who would bid the highest are higher ranks, who would prefer the higher artifact production and size over the VR research.
_________________   Banner by SirKillsALot |
| Thu Jan 26, 2012 4:12 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 10:05 pm Posts: 128 Location: Canada
|
RigorMortis wrote: I would hazard a guess at the Oceanic, as many who would bid the highest are higher ranks, who would prefer the higher artifact production and size over the VR research. Hmm, ok, but don't people like crystals better because they look good? |
| Thu Jan 26, 2012 4:32 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 4:43 pm Posts: 2110
|
Someone might like a crystal for the looks, but I believe the oceanic would be better.
I would recommend waiting for other, higher ranks to reply here first though. I'm just going off of what I would prefer, although it is quite possible I am wrong. _________________ Banner by SirKillsALot |
| Thu Jan 26, 2012 4:34 am |
|
|
|
 Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 6:49 pm Posts: 8964
|
Size + Artifact availability trumps everything else.
_________________ Ranks 400+ Join us in exploring..  [20:40] Wredz: just hacked a massive extremely rich minting planet from someone.. thats the best planet i ever hacked [20:43] DarthFlagitious: is it spearmint or peppermint? |
| Thu Jan 26, 2012 4:37 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 6:47 pm Posts: 240
|
Rank 550, and I would pay more for the oceanic than the crystal.
Actual production matters in the numbers. The Looks of a planet... well they dont affect at all. I would be interested in either, but would prefer the oceanic _________________  |
| Thu Jan 26, 2012 4:38 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 10:05 pm Posts: 128 Location: Canada
|
Darth Flagitious wrote: Size + Artifact availability trumps everything else. Out of curiosity, would a M 5x gaia be more valuable than a M 6x Oceanic? |
| Thu Jan 26, 2012 4:49 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 6:47 pm Posts: 240
|
anomunus wrote: Darth Flagitious wrote: Size + Artifact availability trumps everything else. Out of curiosity, would a M 5x gaia be more valuable than a M 6x Oceanic? Not to me. The gaia gets a boost from the octafari artifact for more pop, but the more resources on the oceanic is preferable. _________________ |
| Thu Jan 26, 2012 4:51 am |
|
|
|
 Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 1:08 am Posts: 3142
|
Boligon wrote: anomunus wrote: Darth Flagitious wrote: Size + Artifact availability trumps everything else. Out of curiosity, would a M 5x gaia be more valuable than a M 6x Oceanic? Not to me. The gaia gets a boost from the octafari artifact for more pop, but the more resources on the oceanic is preferable. Agreed. Looks are irrelevant. Size and artifact production are key _________________  http://www.universegenesis.com/bonus.php?id=7704&rofl=1f1616039121f25&lol=72141855&boss=SteelWolverine ICBLF wrote: to be honest, I was rooting for you even while eating KVTs |
| Thu Jan 26, 2012 4:58 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[ 9 posts ] |
|
All times are UTC |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests |
| You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum |