joppasta right COD 4 is pretty much quick scopers, i prefer the Aug para myself for MW2.

MW2 is full of cheating 12 year old scum as well. In fact, so is black ops.. but it isn't as widespread yet.

agreed thats why i play Halo:Reach alot less mics and a lot less 12yr olds XD

... No ...

Really? That's sad.. I played MW2 alot when it first come out but stopped playing once bad company 2 came out. I REALLY love bad company 2. It's far better than MW2.. Black Ops. I have no idea if someone cheat but I do face some very tough opponents and wondered how they do that and I just assumed that they were just very skilled players.. I got tired of Black Ops pretty quick because of very tiny maps that makes sniper rather useless. My favorite class is sniper where it really shines in Bad Company 2 with gigantic maps..

Anyone else notice Joppsta just complains about everything he is bad at? which seems to be everything lol.

dude nocifer i love Bad co 2 aswell lol #&$# man if you had a xbox id play with yea not a ps3 fan.

guys get online.....black ops it up.....oh and i only use iron sights on my gun..ak-74u- grip, rapid fire.

I would tear you a new anus in Black Ops actually. And you can't say I'm bad at GL.. because nobody is really any good at GL. This game requires no skill to play, just a fat pocket or good luck. Memory and alarm clocks too, if you want.



CoD has been slowly going downhill since after CoD 3 i'd say. CoD 4 was the pinnacle of CoD's before the sniper got abused to death by people that seem to not know what the definition of sniper truly is. Any real sniper would spin in their grave at what today's generations believe to be called sniping, i'd say.


Sure, it's a game, but most of my world war 2 knowledge comes from a combination of games and discovery channel. Imagine playing just games and having that to base your opinions off? (Yeah, I know, any rational person doesn't believe there's any true accuracy in games but let's face facts.. the world is getting dumber).


Oh and Bad Company 2 was certainly an excellent game... but sniping is what kills it for me. The key point I'm away to make here.. relies on you respecting the fact the class with the sniper is aptly named the "Recon" class. Motion sensors + Knife = Good tactic. Now, generally speaking.. a good RECON player will be at the front, motion sensor in hand.. racking up assists off that motion sensor and perhaps a few knife/pistol kills. A bad one, sits in a bush.. making good use of their Wookie's Weekly magazine.

The biggest problem, for me, with Bad Company though, in general.. is they tried to become CoD .. and Battlefield is not CoD. They rotate maps. They have more infantry centric fighting.. THIS IS BATTLEFIELD.. MORE VEHICLES!!!! And there's only one good map with Helis. I played that map to death btw. I remember raining death and taking choppers down in tanks on that bad boy... ahh those were the days



I'm actually looking to pick Bad Company 2 back up again... is the Vietnam expansion worth laying down £20 for the game again?


Oh and the map i was talking about was a conquest map. You know, the game mode that makes battlefield.. well.. battlefield. This gold rush nonsense just promotes sitting in a bush at the back of the map. It's retarded when you've got a team of wookies backing you up on the attacker's side

This is the cancer that is killing Black Ops already btw... just to point out. It's basically Black Ops' M16... and Ghost is Black Ops' Commando.

It's amazing that a bin bag makes you invisible to a Spy Plane. Thank god Blackbirds reveal Ghosts... I love it when i inevitably get one.. or my buddy does.. then the payback commences !

i like how you call the snipers wookies, but yea if you want to try a decent sniper game that involves well actually sniping try a game called "Sniper" ive only seen it in 360 format i havnt bought it yet because its still after 5 months 50 bucks. but it looks legit and yea i hate the quick scopers they are a pain but yet they think their badass? im like if we met in RL sniper fight i would own you because i would just wait for you dumbness to pop out your head and blamo their goes your left lobe.

Eh, being smart can give you a big advantage too, that's part of why I'm doing so well: I'm very good at figuring out the most efficient way to do anything (that's what CS is all about O_o).

Lol. GL does take a skill. Teamwork takes a skill.. Communication, coordination, politics, timing, and all that takes skill. I anticipated many things what would happen in GL in near future and planned for it in advance and they usually came as I had expected. Heck, I designed this legion on first day in anticipation of what would happen in next several months so I prepared everything in advance to help legion to survive.. It does take a skill... Designing right kind of ship takes a skill to predict how ship would survive. I knew that tactical officers and high AP would be very useful down the road when almost everyone fell on the same bandwagon of high RP during early phase of GL last Spring til I was first one to say that high AP production is also viable path and now we have two routes: High RP or high AP.. Yes, It takes skill also..

How is having foresight and planning all of a sudden skill? Did they change the dictionary definition or did i not get the memo?

Like i said, GL does not require skill... it doesn't really require intelligence either unless you're some absolute idiot. Being able to understand simple math and having some interest in the game gets you to do stuff efficiently.


Being able to use your brain is not skill. It is a skill.. but it is not skill. I call that planning personally. Executing coordinated strikes.. now that.. i could *maybe* put into the skill category but if Dan got the legion chat improved slightly so it was actually a feasible communications platform for coordination .. (feasible as in, efficient and easy to use, it's useable in it's current state but there's huge stacks of room for improvement) then maybe it wouldn't really be skill.


Everything in your post could be argued a skill in other games but in a game like GL i cannot see how you can say something is skill when really, something like politics doesn't really matter much in this game..




I'm going to stop before i go around in circles here.. since it's late and I'm tired.

for what it is worth!
I have taken a net 5 planets during this war. I have lost only a net 1. One planet was taken by me and then taken back by the owner. After that I learned how to defend taken planets.
I think I may be the only Dysonian that doesn't enjoy the WAR probably because I'm in the bottom ten of the Dysonian's per rank. I'm unemployed and am not spending money to gain rank. At one point I made it up to #39 and now lets just say I dropped like a rock!
I generally do not do PvP. When asked/instructed I will eat traps, invade (generally when someone else failed).
I'm happy to be part of the 'infantry' of the Dysonian's.

whats your ingame Brian....planets i cant help but i will ask my guys not to hit you for straight pvp. There are plenty of other Dysonians to fight, since its no fun for you ill do my best to accommodate you

It's ok. I did change my in game name for a reason.
I only get hit when I take a planet.
In fact when I see a person in a legion we are at war with pop up in my battle I'm suppose to engage the enemy so they will response and I can alert the legion to them. Being in the mid 200's I get to see players of much lower rank than vast majority of the Dysonians. So I dutifully do so. In the past week I have disabled or set off traps on 5 Kights of Ni players I believe. Not one responds! So I couldn't alert my legion-mates.

I'm not sure why. Maybe they don't want to give me the opportunity to alert on them. Getting access to lower ranked members of legions we are at war with is one of the best things I bring to the table during this war.

So any of you lower ranked players out their. If someone in the mid 200's of rank in the Dysonians disables you or sets off a trap. Please respond in kind so the very few of us that have access to you can alert you to other Dysonians members. My legion mates really do like to PvP.

LOL
War this war that....you guys need to lighten up and have fun.....i guess some of you are to immature to understand that.....little in life....big in game....what ever.....not even a thanks anyway, no manners either....ugg this game sucks

Romans 12:3
For by the grace given me I say to every one of you: Do not think of yourself more highly than you ought, but rather think of yourself with sober judgment, in accordance with the measure of faith God has given you.

Oh and Bad Company 2 was certainly an excellent game... but sniping is what kills it for me. The key point I'm away to make here.. relies on you respecting the fact the class with the sniper is aptly named the "Recon" class. Motion sensors + Knife = Good tactic. Now, generally speaking.. a good RECON player will be at the front, motion sensor in hand.. racking up assists off that motion sensor and perhaps a few knife/pistol kills. A bad one, sits in a bush.. making good use of their Wookie's Weekly magazine.

The biggest problem, for me, with Bad Company though, in general.. is they tried to become CoD .. and Battlefield is not CoD. They rotate maps. They have more infantry centric fighting.. THIS IS BATTLEFIELD.. MORE VEHICLES!!!! And there's only one good map with Helis. I played that map to death btw. I remember raining death and taking choppers down in tanks on that bad boy... ahh those were the days



I'm actually looking to pick Bad Company 2 back up again... is the Vietnam expansion worth laying down £20 for the game again?


Oh and the map i was talking about was a conquest map. You know, the game mode that makes battlefield.. well.. battlefield. This gold rush nonsense just promotes sitting in a bush at the back of the map. It's retarded when you've got a team of wookies backing you up on the attacker's side[/quote]

Oops missed that part or you just added that part.. Yes, I really hope that Bad Company 2 won't follow damn COD's step trying to grab some extra moolah but it won't last forever. BC2 has lot of potential. I do love riding vehicles very much. I understand about RECON but I really love to hide and shoot very very far seeing bullet drop at great distance just to hit its mark while soldier is running just to drop dead that put a big smile on my face. I love to hide in very obvious spots such as little bush while enemies just walked past me without noticing me only to find knife stabbed in his back. They are too busy looking for "obvious" popular sniper spots and hunt them down. I don't go to those obvious spots. One biggest gripe I have with COD is kill cam that kills sniper a lot (other than hardcore). I shoot, then enemy can review where I was at then come to kill me so that's why I had to MOVE everytime I shoot because if I stay to shoot again, I'll get knifed easily. I also feel too tight in COD:OPs with tiny maps it have..

I really am very leaning toward to buy Vietman expansion for BC2. Nice thing about BC2 is that you level up much slower than COD:OPs does.. I'm tired of COD:Ops already. I played BC2 for few months and still am not tired of it.. BC2 got something right that COD:OPs didn't..

You somehow messed up that quote; anyway...

Yeah, i rock the recon for knife kills. Easily the most fun class if you play for CQC but i do enjoy engineer/medic since i find you rack up more points playing as a team player in BC2. That's one of the good things about it. Sadly they really need a tutorial that this is the case... also the fact you can slap a red dot on snipers is retarded... that really annoyed me when i saw it >_<