This is GreyWind, formerly dawgg, formerly jdawgg, signing out of this thread for good.

If you wanted the answer you could have asked RoO members instead of taking a rumor to the forums.



Given his history with RoO he is clearly just starting crap on the forums.


And just to make it perfectly clear. There is no NAP between RoO and the Dysonians

my history? i asked a question, it is not my fault that some people, not saying any names(*cough* joe *cough*) took it the wrong way

Greywind, signing out of this thread....yet again.

Sorry. I wasn't checking GL forums much for last few weeks til I see this just now..

To answer your question officially, FALSE, we never had any NAP with ROO not even now..

Our legion's NAP are Unknown and Galactic Paladins due to our common goal of base farmings. Since bases are strong so that encouraged the need of battle pact and NAP to strengthen our unity to find level 5+ base farming easier and minimize the resource drain on our 3 legions..

To answer other poster's questions about Dysonians never had NAPs.. Dysonians never had one til base PVP system came in effect and we tried to stay NAP-free for first few months and were able to farm level 4+ all the time but the reward from raiding was introduced for level 5+ that made level 4 farming worthless. We were able to stay on level 5 all the time but average level 5 bases had gotten stronger and started to put some strain on our legion's resource so that was when I saw the need of allying other legion to spread out the resource cost plus increase efficiency of farming so we chose Unknown as first choice because they are the least enemy of top 10 legion that we faced. Actually, they were never our enemy to start with so it's most logical to ally with in first place.. Later, we added GP to our alliance simply because Kaos was gone and GP and Unknown both legions came on good terms with each other so it makes logical sense to include GP in the alliance..

Now, we are pretty happy with 3-legion alliance when it comes to level 5 base farmings. We always farm level 5 on daily basis. 3 level 5 bases per day gives us nice silver badge income along with nice raiding loot to strengthen ourselves.. Do our alliance need 4th legion for alliance? Not at this moment unless we start to farm level 6+ if there are better reward for it being added.. Right now, level 5 gives optimal reward for its cost than any other levels so we stick to that..

For the future reference, we refused to work with legion that had Kaos, Baltar, Bender so go on.. Likewise, we refuse to ally or NAP with a legion that has Fluffy.. Therefore, allying with ROO is out of question.. I don't understand why people would think that ROO and Dysonians would have NAP or any kind of alliance as long as Fluffy is still there based on past history last winter/spring? I'm not going to repeat why it happened cuz it'll simply derail this thread so be civil.

Maybe you should get your head out of your ass and learn to read.

"is that why RoO and The Dysonians have a NAP with each other?"
^^ Means that we DO have a NAP with the Dysonians and he is questioning the nap.

"So, is it true that the dysonians and ROO have a nap?"
Would be asking IF we had a nap. There is a HUGE difference between the two.

Maybe you should go back to school and learn to comprehend things a little better.

Actually, He can ask anything he wants but just because he asked a question doesn't mean he is entitled to an answer. I owe him nothing.

Then ask a question rather than making statements or implications.

"is that why RoO and The Dysonians have a NAP with each other?"
^^ Implies that there is a nap and you're questioning why. If you cannot grasp the concept of what i'm saying here then i feel very sorry for you.

ok guys leave the thread at that now, JDawwg said hes not gonna respond here anymore so do the same as the questions been answered about whther or not Dysonians have an NAP with ROO

My feelings are hurt! I don't know how I'll ever be able to go on living without your love!

thank you for taking the time to answer my question, nocifer. at least you didn't start to yell at me, like fluffy did.

Your new to legion diplomacy arnt you?

Nope. Been doing it for quite some time and am quite successful at it.

i didn't ask YOU the question, joe. i asked it in general, meaning that a leader or officer would be able to provide me an answer.

now that it's pretty clear what the answer is...

CAN WE JUST DROP THIS THREAD???
or at least hijack it with brownies or muffins or gummi bears bouncing here and there and everywhere

Things can be interpreted in different ways. You saw it as an assumption, I saw it as a question.
FYI: I can comprehend very well. You are stuck on your own little world thinking that everyone is beneath you. Do us all, and yourself, a favor and rethink your status on the forums. That is all. period. End of Story.
PONIES

i agree, they do suck, xzien

You're entitled to your own opinion however misguided it might be. Don't let your distaste for me cloud your better judgement

The question he asked was not IF there was a nap. He ASSUMED that there was a nap. The question he ask was WHY there was a nap. capiche?

I sense a bit of hypocracy there... but whatever.

what'd you expect, bro. its joe were talking about/too