Author |
Message |
ODragon
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 1:16 am Posts: 3824
|
Fenix wrote: This is an excellent idea and certainly a great improvement over the current in-game tutorial. The in game tutorial isn't that bad, it is just almost 4 years old and because of that, misses out on a lot of the current great additions. Like draxsiss said, a production mission would be useful, as would one on finding a legion.
|
Sat Nov 02, 2013 1:18 am |
|
 |
draxsiss
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:10 pm Posts: 772
|
This helps new players alot, It also likely will not upset established players (a free x3 mega rich planet that costs me no planet slot/conize fees) and a new extra ally for new stats.
Other suggestions,
One mission about hacking that takes blue badages, one about raiding that takes yellow. LIkely in the PVP section. (I realise most players save their yellows for armourys at the start however small 10 badge mission maybe that gives some crew bots to help in futuer raids? no idea how to work that ) I just think giving them a better debth in to hacking and perticuarly how important raiding is would also be a good idea.
|
Sat Nov 02, 2013 3:09 am |
|
 |
Fenix
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 12:33 am Posts: 802
|
ODragon wrote: Fenix wrote: This is an excellent idea and certainly a great improvement over the current in-game tutorial. The in game tutorial isn't that bad, it is just almost 4 years old and because of that, misses out on a lot of the current great additions. Like draxsiss said, a production mission would be useful, as would one on finding a legion. While true, the current tutorial is more of a UI guide than anything else in my opinion. it probably could use some follow up tutorials such as what to do when a base is locked, when you find an enemy planet, where the legion chat is (this shouldn't even need a tutorial but so many new players seem to completely miss it until someone comms them notifying them that there's a legion chat at the very bottom of the page), or fighting a player's ship, alerts.
_________________ Former leader of Anomaly Elite.
|
Sat Nov 02, 2013 3:40 pm |
|
 |
Serne
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 5:36 am Posts: 970
|
This is the most well thought out suggestion I think i have ever seen. Definitely giving it a +1. New player retention is important.
_________________SIG'D The Prisoner wrote: You know something's wrong when the Trade Outpost sub-forum has the most interesting topics Well it was an ill considered idea in the first place.
|
Sat Nov 02, 2013 4:36 pm |
|
 |
ODragon
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 1:16 am Posts: 3824
|
draxsiss wrote: (a free x3 mega rich planet that costs me no planet slot/conize fees) And remember, because the planet can't be taken, it is a safe place for new player to put things the don't want lose. Older player could either use it as an undefended/uncloaked storage planet or just a pure production where they can put things they might not on an undefended 3x planet.
|
Sat Nov 02, 2013 4:42 pm |
|
 |
draxsiss
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:10 pm Posts: 772
|
Here dan this is your next by weekly mission already written up 
|
Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:30 pm |
|
 |
Peticks
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:44 pm Posts: 1997 Location: Causing chaos somewhere
|
Love it. The tutorial definatly needs a boost its probably putting off a lot of players before they have even started to get into the game. I'd like personaly to see maybe tacked on to the end of the tutorial the requirement to join a legion for the last mission to be completed.
_________________ Meow chika meow meow!!Stark Tech Inside
Last edited by Peticks on Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:51 am, edited 2 times in total.
|
Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:39 am |
|
 |
William Murphy
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 11:02 am Posts: 191 Location: Shalimar, Florida
|
+! for me. Well thought out and New WELL BALANCED content is always a +1
Now... just has to get Dan's Approval and for him to code it in...
|
Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:43 am |
|
 |
DarkMar
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 2:27 pm Posts: 1220
|

+1 I love it ODragon only 2 minor detalis I can see, that I dont like Quote: Gain: Robo-hauler Ally Rank 75: +5% cargo (Fixed, no rank bonus) Rank 100: +3% storage (Fixed, no rank bonus) the % bonus helps high rank players more then it does new players think it would be better for low rank players to simply get a fixed number like 5K cargo and 10K storidge from this ally and the Deep-Core Exotic Extractor Blue-Prints* Quote: Deep-Core Exotic Extractor: Planetary building, size 1, mining/research/artifact +1. If built on an exotic or rift planet, production doubles and +50 Exotic Matter per hour per extractor. Cap for this would be equal to 1:100th your mining capacity including mining storage buildings. (Not sure if this is a viable option but would make smaller exotic planets a little more enticing). Max 1 per planet. I agrey, small exotic planets could an upgrade and with the EM requirements for some of the legion mission we could use an alternativ way to get more EM but I'm not sure making it a recurce you can get from exotic and rift planets would work very well
_________________Champion of Darmos 
|
Fri Nov 08, 2013 2:45 pm |
|
 |
Vorenus
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 4:49 pm Posts: 217
|
ODragon wrote: Cost: 10 energy Attempts: 10 Rounds: 1 Gain: Home World coordinate data: Gives you an invulnerable, tiny toxic with all very sparse stats. Colonization of planet gives perm ability, stealth screen and explains colonization events.
Side note about planet: While invincible, I do not think it should be invisible or have major cloak to start with. When attacked, production is reduced by 50% for a period of 2 days and the game insta-fluxes it. This would give people an incentive to max out the passive cloak on it but would also allow people to use Uldri artifacts, etc on their planets. The person attacking would get a small random amount of arties/mining/research, maybe the equivalent of a 15 min of their production (Planetary Raid Cache).
so this is a planet that can be scanned, invincible, and still able to be attacked? Also, is this homeworld open to planetary events or no? I like the idea and would love a free storage planet 
_________________ 
|
Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:10 pm |
|
 |
ODragon
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 1:16 am Posts: 3824
|
Vorenus wrote: so this is a planet that can be scanned, invincible, and still able to be attacked? Also, is this homeworld open to planetary events or no? I like the idea and would love a free storage planet  Invincible can't be invaded, not invincible, can't be attacked. It is a good point to clarify.
|
Sat Nov 09, 2013 2:12 am |
|
 |
draxsiss
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:10 pm Posts: 772
|
I think this needs a bump, as dan is reading suggestions/more active on the boards lately and this was a great one.
|
Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:57 am |
|
 |
Rakshasa
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 2:52 am Posts: 200
|
So, homeworlds as an advanced tutorial? Very good, retention of new people is essential, I really like this idea a lot. To echo someone above me, joining a legion should be included, as well as whats expected from bases etc. too many noob legions out there failing already, getting the bulk of them to combine forces and be resource independent....priceless. Recipe for success and a new ERA for GL. VERY WELL DONE.
|
Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:32 pm |
|
 |
draxsiss
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:10 pm Posts: 772
|
A bumb for what I consider the best suggestion ever made on this board.
|
Thu Apr 28, 2016 1:50 am |
|
 |
kirkeastment
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 6:24 pm Posts: 2810 Location: UK
|
draxsiss wrote: A bumb for what I consider the best suggestion ever made on this board. It's already been implemented.... The Prismatic Planet is your Homeworld that requires you to upgrade it with costs of materials and energy. 
|
Thu Apr 28, 2016 5:23 am |
|
 |
draxsiss
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:10 pm Posts: 772
|
was more refering too it as a great tutoral for new players then homeworld aspect of it. Also the fact that you have to wait 5 years to get access too it makes it kinda crappy, (serrouly if they made this available immediately at least we could start the low end ctp requirements/getting our planets productions up)
|
Thu Apr 28, 2016 5:59 pm |
|
 |
|