...
| Galaxy Legion Forum http://galaxylegion.com/forum/ |
|
| that 98%... http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=43067 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Peticks [ Thu May 14, 2015 12:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | that 98%... |
... |
|
| Author: | KJReed [ Thu May 14, 2015 5:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: that 98%... |
Are they active? |
|
| Author: | Chloron [ Thu May 14, 2015 6:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: that 98%... |
Peticks wrote: Why do you have my planet flagged!!!!!!!  
|
|
| Author: | Peticks [ Thu May 14, 2015 6:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: that 98%... |
Chloron wrote: Peticks wrote: Why do you have my planet flagged!!!!!!! that was your planet? ahahahaha note the was  and yeah the guy who owned it before was active, in a 60 member legion with 120% defence so XD |
|
| Author: | Sirier [ Sat May 30, 2015 2:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: that 98%... |
I've also seen 95% and 97%. Everyone knows you get 90% on invades that should be a given, ie 100%. 0 def/att, etc. I've always assumed that when you get something higher than 90%, that that's your actual chances. Just like when it shows your chances below 90%. I just assume Dan coded only the 100% to show 90%, not the stuff in between, so they follow the coding for all the other failure chances. This is just a theory, so please don't quote me on it. And if anyone has any evidence to the contrary, I welcome it. |
|
| Author: | asquall [ Sat May 30, 2015 9:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: that 98%... |
Sirier wrote: I've also seen 95% and 97%. Everyone knows you get 90% on invades that should be a given, ie 100%. 0 def/att, etc. I've always assumed that when you get something higher than 90%, that that's your actual chances. Just like when it shows your chances below 90%. I just assume Dan coded only the 100% to show 90%, not the stuff in between, so they follow the coding for all the other failure chances. This is just a theory, so please don't quote me on it. And if anyone has any evidence to the contrary, I welcome it. 90+ chances are only allowed if the owner is inactive for xxx I don't know how long they can be inactive til they lose cloak and 'invasion chance def bonus' |
|
| Author: | Persephone [ Sun May 31, 2015 3:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: that 98%... |
Sirier wrote: I've also seen 95% and 97%. Everyone knows you get 90% on invades that should be a given, ie 100%. 0 def/att, etc. I've always assumed that when you get something higher than 90%, that that's your actual chances. Just like when it shows your chances below 90%. I just assume Dan coded only the 100% to show 90%, not the stuff in between, so they follow the coding for all the other failure chances. This is just a theory, so please don't quote me on it. And if anyone has any evidence to the contrary, I welcome it. I failed a planet invasion yesterday and it said I had a 95% chance. I checked to see if the player was active and he was so I know it can happen. But your theory makes a lot of sense Sirier. I am inclined to think that anything above 90% is scaled down to 90% and for whatever reason a small glitch occurs from time to time that shows you your actual mathematical invade probability. |
|
| Author: | KJReed [ Sun May 31, 2015 6:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: that 98%... |
Persephone wrote: Sirier wrote: I've also seen 95% and 97%. Everyone knows you get 90% on invades that should be a given, ie 100%. 0 def/att, etc. I've always assumed that when you get something higher than 90%, that that's your actual chances. Just like when it shows your chances below 90%. I just assume Dan coded only the 100% to show 90%, not the stuff in between, so they follow the coding for all the other failure chances. This is just a theory, so please don't quote me on it. And if anyone has any evidence to the contrary, I welcome it. I failed a planet invasion yesterday and it said I had a 95% chance. I checked to see if the player was active and he was so I know it can happen. But your theory makes a lot of sense Sirier. I am inclined to think that anything above 90% is scaled down to 90% and for whatever reason a small glitch occurs from time to time that shows you your actual mathematical invade probability. im wondering if its close to this but instead of anything above 90% showing 90% its only above 100% showing as 90. and anything inbetween shows up as what the calculated chance should be. very hard to test for though. |
|
| Author: | juiceman [ Mon Jun 01, 2015 2:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: that 98%... |
shakes fist at ambiguity of rng...damn the 2 standard deviation fail!!! |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|