| View unanswered posts | View active topics |
It is currently Wed May 07, 2025 6:34 pm |
|
All times are UTC |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[ 9 posts ] |
| Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
that 98%...
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:44 pm Posts: 1997 Location: Causing chaos somewhere 
|
  ... _________________   Meow chika meow meow!! Stark Tech Inside |
| Thu May 14, 2015 12:57 pm |
|
|
|
 Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 1:08 am Posts: 3142
|
Are they active?
_________________  http://www.universegenesis.com/bonus.php?id=7704&rofl=1f1616039121f25&lol=72141855&boss=SteelWolverine ICBLF wrote: to be honest, I was rooting for you even while eating KVTs |
| Thu May 14, 2015 5:43 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 5:47 pm Posts: 1513
|
Peticks wrote: Why do you have my planet flagged!!!!!!!   _________________ XxDarthDexterxX wrote: You deserve a cookie, and earn yourself one cookie point.  |
| Thu May 14, 2015 6:09 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:44 pm Posts: 1997 Location: Causing chaos somewhere
|
Chloron wrote: Peticks wrote: Why do you have my planet flagged!!!!!!! that was your planet? ahahahaha note the was  and yeah the guy who owned it before was active, in a 60 member legion with 120% defence so XD _________________ Meow chika meow meow!! Stark Tech Inside |
| Thu May 14, 2015 6:25 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 3:59 am Posts: 17
|
I've also seen 95% and 97%.
Everyone knows you get 90% on invades that should be a given, ie 100%. 0 def/att, etc. I've always assumed that when you get something higher than 90%, that that's your actual chances. Just like when it shows your chances below 90%. I just assume Dan coded only the 100% to show 90%, not the stuff in between, so they follow the coding for all the other failure chances. This is just a theory, so please don't quote me on it. And if anyone has any evidence to the contrary, I welcome it. |
| Sat May 30, 2015 2:37 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:22 am Posts: 1121
|
Sirier wrote: I've also seen 95% and 97%. Everyone knows you get 90% on invades that should be a given, ie 100%. 0 def/att, etc. I've always assumed that when you get something higher than 90%, that that's your actual chances. Just like when it shows your chances below 90%. I just assume Dan coded only the 100% to show 90%, not the stuff in between, so they follow the coding for all the other failure chances. This is just a theory, so please don't quote me on it. And if anyone has any evidence to the contrary, I welcome it. 90+ chances are only allowed if the owner is inactive for xxx I don't know how long they can be inactive til they lose cloak and 'invasion chance def bonus' |
| Sat May 30, 2015 9:58 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 12:24 pm Posts: 208
|
Sirier wrote: I've also seen 95% and 97%. Everyone knows you get 90% on invades that should be a given, ie 100%. 0 def/att, etc. I've always assumed that when you get something higher than 90%, that that's your actual chances. Just like when it shows your chances below 90%. I just assume Dan coded only the 100% to show 90%, not the stuff in between, so they follow the coding for all the other failure chances. This is just a theory, so please don't quote me on it. And if anyone has any evidence to the contrary, I welcome it. I failed a planet invasion yesterday and it said I had a 95% chance. I checked to see if the player was active and he was so I know it can happen. But your theory makes a lot of sense Sirier. I am inclined to think that anything above 90% is scaled down to 90% and for whatever reason a small glitch occurs from time to time that shows you your actual mathematical invade probability. |
| Sun May 31, 2015 3:32 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 1:08 am Posts: 3142
|
Persephone wrote: Sirier wrote: I've also seen 95% and 97%. Everyone knows you get 90% on invades that should be a given, ie 100%. 0 def/att, etc. I've always assumed that when you get something higher than 90%, that that's your actual chances. Just like when it shows your chances below 90%. I just assume Dan coded only the 100% to show 90%, not the stuff in between, so they follow the coding for all the other failure chances. This is just a theory, so please don't quote me on it. And if anyone has any evidence to the contrary, I welcome it. I failed a planet invasion yesterday and it said I had a 95% chance. I checked to see if the player was active and he was so I know it can happen. But your theory makes a lot of sense Sirier. I am inclined to think that anything above 90% is scaled down to 90% and for whatever reason a small glitch occurs from time to time that shows you your actual mathematical invade probability. im wondering if its close to this but instead of anything above 90% showing 90% its only above 100% showing as 90. and anything inbetween shows up as what the calculated chance should be. very hard to test for though. _________________ http://www.universegenesis.com/bonus.php?id=7704&rofl=1f1616039121f25&lol=72141855&boss=SteelWolverine ICBLF wrote: to be honest, I was rooting for you even while eating KVTs |
| Sun May 31, 2015 6:05 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2014 6:17 pm Posts: 2224
|
shakes fist at ambiguity of rng...damn the 2 standard deviation fail!!!
_________________   Signature created by Necromancer Spy status_ #1 Cloak master in galaxy Moooooooooooooooooooo! |
| Mon Jun 01, 2015 2:19 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[ 9 posts ] |
|
All times are UTC |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests |
| You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum |