View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri May 09, 2025 6:04 pm



Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
 Rate my rustbucket 
Author Message

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 12:34 am
Posts: 84
Reply with quote
The Pirate Cuddlepuff
Rank 588 Lazuli Fixer
Icariums Fate (49)
Combat Reputation: Insane

Size Class: Galaxy Destroyer
Space: 3418 / 3422
Attack: 10,046
Defense: 15,478
Scan: 1331
Cloak: 0
Cargo: 15078 / 48360
Upkeep: 8.8B
Lazuli: Hull +50%
Fixer: Hull +30%

637 / 6290 Energy
56541 / 56541 Hull
7480 / 7480 Shield

~17k/h Research
~12k/h Mining
~29k - 32k/h Artifact

4751 Engineers
4162 Tactical Officers

Battles 168608 (Epic Legend)
Player Kills 1729
Deaths from Players 174
Non-Player Kills 9893
Planets Found 595
Planets Occupied 141
Planets Captured 79
Missions Completed 985
Scans Performed 2342
Successful Hacks 1259
Successful Raids 1687

_________________
Quote:
Quote:
From: XBDSxRobocop
Jigoku Shoujo is attacking me now. Can you disable her please?

Mommy, I want a bottle! and you need to change my nappy too, I #&$# myself!!!


Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:14 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 3:12 pm
Posts: 725
Location: England
Reply with quote
marginal. the hull is good, only because of laz fixer. the def and attack are alright. (could be better) cloak is pathetic as you know and scan is decent

overall you are decent.

the productions, bravo! they are good.

_________________
Image


Last edited by Dreadlost on Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:31 am, edited 1 time in total.



Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:58 pm
Profile

Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:02 pm
Posts: 142
Reply with quote
Dreadlost wrote:
marginal. the hull is good, only because of laz fixer. the def and attack are alright. (could be better) scan is pathetic as you know and cloak is decent

overall you are decent.

the productions, bravo! they are good.


i think you meant cloak is pathetic and scan is decent


Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:11 pm
Profile

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 12:34 am
Posts: 84
Reply with quote
jx2012 wrote:
Dreadlost wrote:
marginal. the hull is good, only because of laz fixer. the def and attack are alright. (could be better) scan is pathetic as you know and cloak is decent

overall you are decent.

the productions, bravo! they are good.


i think you meant cloak is pathetic and scan is decent


Ever heard of being under the influence of a QFT?

_________________
Quote:
Quote:
From: XBDSxRobocop
Jigoku Shoujo is attacking me now. Can you disable her please?

Mommy, I want a bottle! and you need to change my nappy too, I #&$# myself!!!


Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:53 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 1:13 pm
Posts: 55
Reply with quote
Dreadlost wrote:
marginal. the hull is good, only because of laz fixer. the def and attack are alright. (could be better) cloak is pathetic as you know and scan is decent

overall you are decent.

the productions, bravo! they are good.


On the opposite of this, your attack number is more then decent (being lazuli), your hull is very good (not only because of lazuli fixer..) , defense is nice. Scan/cloak is supposed to be low when you have 3400 deck and go for a battle ship build, productions are awesome.

Coming from an experienced late pvpers.

_________________
Image


Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:58 pm
Profile

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 12:34 am
Posts: 84
Reply with quote
Gone Taltherian Excavator to boost my artifact production even higher

6290 Energy
29040 Hull
7516 Shield

Size Class: Galaxy Destroyer
Space: 3458 / 3462
Attack: 14710 buffed
Defense: 18578 buffed
Scan: 1431
Cloak: 640
Cargo: 15657 / 48360
Upkeep: 8.8B
Taltherian: Urbanize
Excavator: Artifact +10%

_________________
Quote:
Quote:
From: XBDSxRobocop
Jigoku Shoujo is attacking me now. Can you disable her please?

Mommy, I want a bottle! and you need to change my nappy too, I #&$# myself!!!


Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:51 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 3:12 pm
Posts: 725
Location: England
Reply with quote
IceCubeIceCold wrote:
jx2012 wrote:
Dreadlost wrote:
marginal. the hull is good, only because of laz fixer. the def and attack are alright. (could be better) scan is pathetic as you know and cloak is decent

overall you are decent.

the productions, bravo! they are good.


i think you meant cloak is pathetic and scan is decent


Ever heard of being under the influence of a QFT?

you just made yourself look stupid....you ask for review of ship and put your cloak as 0 and complain when people criticise but you were dumb enough to put your cloak under a QFT debuff.... ?

also why put buffed stats why not simply open up a new tab '14310 - 10%' you get me? xD
not trying to be rude. trust me. not a reflection of in-game.

your ship is decent yes. but lazuli fixer would have been cooler since massive amount of extra hull!!

_________________
Image


Fri Nov 30, 2012 4:48 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 7:10 am
Posts: 123
Reply with quote
Isn't this the GhettoGheddin/Anzid/GoddessofWar/Darth Bunny ship? My understanding is you've poured thousands of real-world dollars into your ship -- is there really any point asking to compare with ships that haven't done the same? I'm not having a go at you -- if that's how you want to play, you have a right to do it that way -- but I don't see any point calling out how your ship is doing when it isn't remotely close to an apples to apples comparison.

_________________
I was Vyger...


Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:23 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:30 am
Posts: 4230
Reply with quote
even as laz fixer you cant buff to my unbuffed , so on the grand scale your a fly on the wall at best. On the tinny scale I imagion people have a hard time with you.

_________________
Image
Image
RNG makes mistake one time, People blame it for life. Damn sucks to be it.


Sat Dec 01, 2012 1:54 am
Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 7:41 am
Posts: 216
Reply with quote
Vyger wrote:
Isn't this the GhettoGheddin/Anzid/GoddessofWar/Darth Bunny ship? My understanding is you've poured thousands of real-world dollars into your ship -- is there really any point asking to compare with ships that haven't done the same? I'm not having a go at you -- if that's how you want to play, you have a right to do it that way -- but I don't see any point calling out how your ship is doing when it isn't remotely close to an apples to apples comparison.


Yes this is that ship. To add to what Vyger has already stated, your productions aren't that impressive either, considering you somehow came across some amazing planets at a very early stage from an oh so generous ship and a level 6 base......simply because you were the only one who asked for them (cough cough). And let's be honest, that's a big reason your ship has any decent numbers at all.

_________________
ImageImage
Image


Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:05 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:20 pm
Posts: 1195
Location: The Milky Way
Reply with quote
IceCubeIceCold wrote:
Gone Taltherian Excavator to boost my artifact production even higher

6290 Energy
29040 Hull
7516 Shield

Size Class: Galaxy Destroyer
Space: 3458 / 3462
Attack: 14710 buffed
Defense: 18578 buffed
Scan: 1431
Cloak: 640
Cargo: 15657 / 48360
Upkeep: 8.8B
Taltherian: Urbanize
Excavator: Artifact +10%

Pity you changed away from Lazuli Fixer. Other than a slight edge in defense I now have you beat in every category. Rank 573 for comparison purposes.

Edit: And in reference to what Vyger said about an unfair comparison, I bought the QSE for my mission dyson, as well as my F.A.T.H.E.R.s and Trinity Core drives. That's pretty much it.

_________________
Image


Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:38 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 11 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 69 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.