| Author |
Message |
|
Jessica
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 6:29 pm
Posts: 296
|
Rank 106
PQI: 73.62962962962963
|
| Wed Apr 04, 2012 2:41 am |
 
|
|
|
The Exterminator
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 6:17 pm
Posts: 1232
|
Rank 626.
Deducted Scientists AND storage planets,
354.9.
(1 Rift, Badly constructed Dyson)
_________________Lumberjack, Konqul Excavator, Officer of Empire of the Sun Currently looking for a tree.
|
| Wed Apr 04, 2012 2:51 pm |
|
|
|
BinaryMan
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:40 pm
Posts: 1671
|
Rank 1971
20406 m / 27932 ap / 51446 rp - 23569 Scientists = 27,877 net RP of planets.
149 planets.
76,215 / 149 = 511.5 (540.5 w/o storage planets).
I went for not getting crap planets this time around specifically. I did in the beginning get some "regular" VL AP planets but those are "too small" to upgrade fully so I'm not getting anymore. Also done getting RP+mining planets, I have plenty already. Frail taught me the lesson of having too many planets costing enormous amounts, so I am essentially going for a max PQI strategy for every slot now.
_________________Ex cinere surget iterum ego galaxiae dominatur. 
|
| Wed Apr 04, 2012 5:41 pm |
|
|
|
Bluecifer
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 11:53 pm
Posts: 3756
Location: Aboard my floating fortress of ineptitude
|
^^^
I was waiting for Binary to post. I knew his would be near the maximum possible.
_________________ Inventor of Invisible SandTM
|
| Wed Apr 04, 2012 5:51 pm |
|
|
|
Tree7304
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:05 am
Posts: 2794
|
BinaryMan wrote: Rank 1971
20406 m / 27932 ap / 51446 rp - 23569 Scientists = 27,877 net RP of planets.
149 planets.
76,215 / 149 = 511.5 (540.5 w/o storage planets).
I went for not getting crap planets this time around specifically. I did in the beginning get some "regular" VL AP planets but those are "too small" to upgrade fully so I'm not getting anymore. Also done getting RP+mining planets, I have plenty already. Frail taught me the lesson of having too many planets costing enormous amounts, so I am essentially going for a max PQI strategy for every slot now. you are the reason why i have so few planets, i don't like taking anything that isn't massive+ _________________ 
Treeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
That's meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
|
| Wed Apr 04, 2012 6:59 pm |
|
|
|
snapdragon
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:52 am
Posts: 1358
|
um can anyone do mine for me i kept trying but i got results like 2000+ which i know is wrong and im messing up somewhere
my stats:
(they are not the best or good at all lol)
mining=1129
artifact=541
research=2400
396 scientists
32 planets occupied
_________________   Its better to be different than to copy everyone else
|
| Wed Apr 04, 2012 11:19 pm |
|
|
|
RigorMortis
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 4:43 pm
Posts: 2110
|
snapdragon wrote: um can anyone do mine for me i kept trying but i got results like 2000+ which i know is wrong and im messing up somewhere
my stats:
(they are not the best or good at all lol)
mining=1129
artifact=541
research=2400
396 scientists
32 planets occupied 1129 + 541 + (2400-396) = 3674/32 = 114.8. _________________ 
Banner by SirKillsALot
|
| Wed Apr 04, 2012 11:44 pm |
|
|
|
n00b
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:06 pm
Posts: 226
|
Minerals 1980 units / hour
Artifacts 3517 points / hour
Production: 3958 research / hour
449 Scientists
Planets Occupied 49
1980+3517-(3958-449) = 9006/49 = 183.8
|
| Thu Apr 05, 2012 4:01 am |
|
|
|
spyder
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 6:32 pm
Posts: 1543
|
Mine's 176/planet.
I only have a Mission exotic - no dyson.
My RP is heavily subsidised by Scientists (200/planet with scientists)
I don't have any % bonuses.
I have 19 open planet slots.
I haven't abandoned any of my rubbish starter planets (because I can't)
My planets have a range of +6s to +10s on (soon to have +12s thrown into the mix)
I'm rank 323
|
| Thu Apr 05, 2012 4:31 am |
|
|
|
BinaryMan
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:40 pm
Posts: 1671
|
 Tree7304 wrote: BinaryMan wrote: Rank 1971
20406 m / 27932 ap / 51446 rp - 23569 Scientists = 27,877 net RP of planets.
149 planets.
76,215 / 149 = 511.5 (540.5 w/o storage planets).
I went for not getting crap planets this time around specifically. I did in the beginning get some "regular" VL AP planets but those are "too small" to upgrade fully so I'm not getting anymore. Also done getting RP+mining planets, I have plenty already. Frail taught me the lesson of having too many planets costing enormous amounts, so I am essentially going for a max PQI strategy for every slot now. you are the reason why i have so few planets, i don't like taking anything that isn't massive+ Note that frail had 50-60k AP, but he had 400+ planets I think, it was costing a lot even to get a 15x AP for him. People like Remric are rich so they just buy AP planets. I farm the snot out of npcs for terraformers and do it the hard way: I upgrade them. Specifically, I make 13/13/17x colossal plasmas from very massive/very sparse gases + 25 terraformers and put max passive cloak on them so they can't be scanned. The SIZE of makes the output better than a 15x VL terra; anything you want that size with a seed/crystalize/etc, you have to spend 2 QSE to get (and I prefer to rift with mine) - not worth it. _________________Ex cinere surget iterum ego galaxiae dominatur.
|
| Thu Apr 05, 2012 4:35 am |
|
|
|
Lavaflume
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 10:44 pm
Posts: 24
|
Rank 285
154 exactly for my planets
_________________
|
| Thu Apr 05, 2012 11:37 pm |
|
|
|
Ruairi
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:37 am
Posts: 614
|
Rank 945
367.82
_________________
|
| Fri Apr 06, 2012 12:24 am |
|
|
|
