Author |
Message |
Yllib
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:41 pm Posts: 297 Location: Earth 626
|
Ok so I hack a guy who has no scan or cloak where as I have 206 scan and 490 cloak, I also have 3 cipher bots installed. How comes I hack him and CRITICALLY FAIL losing a good planet to him (which he then fluxed) then after that failed the next 3 hacks with message enemy computers have blocked the hack?
_________________ Signature created by Necromancer
|
Thu Mar 20, 2014 7:41 pm |
|
 |
ICBLF
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 6:52 pm Posts: 1663 Location: where the dead ships dwell
|
Can I ask how you know they had no scan?
_________________ 
|
Thu Mar 20, 2014 8:19 pm |
|
 |
Yllib
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:41 pm Posts: 297 Location: Earth 626
|
The ship shows no modules installed
_________________ Signature created by Necromancer
|
Thu Mar 20, 2014 8:44 pm |
|
 |
Tree7304
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:05 am Posts: 2794
|
No modules anywhere?
_________________  Treeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee That's meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
|
Thu Mar 20, 2014 8:57 pm |
|
 |
Yllib
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:41 pm Posts: 297 Location: Earth 626
|
Size Class - Light Cruiser Weapons - offline Energy - F.A.T.H.E.R. x2, Omicron Injector Sensors - Continuum Parser Hull - Perfect Fermionic Armor x4, Protean Armory x3 Shields - Harmonic Resonator Cloaking - offline Defenses - Trinity-Core Drive
However he did not have the Continuum Parser installed when I had hacked him multiple times
_________________ Signature created by Necromancer
|
Thu Mar 20, 2014 9:09 pm |
|
 |
Yllib
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:41 pm Posts: 297 Location: Earth 626
|
So can anyone tell me why I crit failed then managed to fail 3 other hacks?
_________________ Signature created by Necromancer
|
Thu Mar 20, 2014 9:22 pm |
|
 |
Adsibearsawsome
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 6:02 pm Posts: 1327
|
everyone starts with 1 scan so there is a chance, although very very unlikely that they can defend a hack. basically i'd say its bad luck, ether that or they had a buff from like a tach cylinder or something like that.
_________________
|
Thu Mar 20, 2014 9:26 pm |
|
 |
Yllib
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:41 pm Posts: 297 Location: Earth 626
|
He had no effects on either but that's a pretty luck guy to be able to block my hacks seeing as I have 3 cipher bots +21% hack and I'm a hacker which has +30%
_________________ Signature created by Necromancer
|
Thu Mar 20, 2014 9:29 pm |
|
 |
senatorhung
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:09 am Posts: 3473
|
http://galaxylegion.com/wiki/index.php/Hackingalways a chance at falure. no word on the percentages .. but given that planet invasions cap at 90%, i would not be surprised if there were always a 10% chance of failure in hacking or raiding. you just failed 2 rolls in a row ... you got the (10% ?) failure on the first roll, and then got another (10% ?) failure on the critical. if those numbers hold up ... then you will always have a 1% chance of a critical hack failure ... hence why hacking is less attractive in pvp versus raiding. i do not mind losing a redshirt here or there ... but losing a good planet ? nyah.
_________________Rank 3950 Litheor Governor 100% DCR r385-r2200 GL Marauder #26 _____________ PvP leaderboards: 70212 raids: #1; 40852 kills: #1; 96377 hacks: #3;
Last edited by senatorhung on Thu Mar 20, 2014 10:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Thu Mar 20, 2014 9:50 pm |
|
 |
Yllib
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:41 pm Posts: 297 Location: Earth 626
|
The first thing I did was check the wiki on hacking. I still don't understand how we managed to block my hack 3 times and cause me to critically fail.
_________________ Signature created by Necromancer
|
Thu Mar 20, 2014 9:55 pm |
|
 |
Chloron
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 5:47 pm Posts: 1513
|
Post a list of his current ship configuration. Perhaps he has a mod that provides scan that isn't listed under scan mods.
_________________XxDarthDexterxX wrote: You deserve a cookie, and earn yourself one cookie point. 
|
Thu Mar 20, 2014 9:57 pm |
|
 |
Yllib
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:41 pm Posts: 297 Location: Earth 626
|
I posted his ship up top
_________________ Signature created by Necromancer
|
Thu Mar 20, 2014 10:04 pm |
|
 |
Yllib
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:41 pm Posts: 297 Location: Earth 626
|
Here is a link showing who and what he is http://prntscr.com/32m7bo
_________________ Signature created by Necromancer
|
Thu Mar 20, 2014 10:05 pm |
|
 |
XxMercasterxX
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 4:32 pm Posts: 186
|
Small ships tend to change up their modules when they hack... He might have uninstalled a bunch of his hull and replaced it with cloak to hack you.
_________________ Co-leader of SGORIP TROYMN
|
Thu Mar 20, 2014 10:13 pm |
|
 |
Yllib
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:41 pm Posts: 297 Location: Earth 626
|
Nope he was unaware because he got alerted so I hacked him and he had the same ship stats as what I posted
_________________ Signature created by Necromancer
|
Thu Mar 20, 2014 10:16 pm |
|
 |
Persephone
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 12:24 pm Posts: 208
|
The RNG just hates you. Now it hates you and plurvious.
|
Thu Mar 20, 2014 10:29 pm |
|
 |
ICBLF
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 6:52 pm Posts: 1663 Location: where the dead ships dwell
|
senatorhung wrote: http://galaxylegion.com/wiki/index.php/Hacking
always a chance at falure. no word on the percentages .. but given that planet invasions cap at 90%, i would not be surprised if there were always a 10% chance of failure in hacking or raiding.
you just failed 2 rolls in a row ... you got the (10% ?) failure on the first roll, and then got anoterh (10% ?) failure on the critical.
if those numbers hold up ... then you will always have a 1% chance of a critical hack failure ... hence why hacking is less attractive in pvp versus raiding. i do not mind losing a redshirt here or there ... but losing a good planet ? nyah. My thought too, this sounds like standard bad luck, like failing three 90% invades and then crit failing the fourth. It happens, and yes, hacking sucks.
_________________ 
|
Thu Mar 20, 2014 10:33 pm |
|
 |
Yllib
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:41 pm Posts: 297 Location: Earth 626
|
I wanna refund my ship then 
_________________ Signature created by Necromancer
|
Fri Mar 21, 2014 1:00 am |
|
 |
|